5 Best Ahrefs Brand Radar Alternatives in 2026

Ahrefs Brand Radar is the most ambitious AI visibility tool in the market by one measure: 253 million monthly prompts tracked across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Overviews, and AI Mode. For brands already on Ahrefs wanting a single platform for SEO and AI visibility, the integration with Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, and Rank Tracker is genuinely valuable.

The problems are well-documented. Independent testing found Brand Radar reporting 3 ChatGPT mentions where 123 actually occurred, and 6 Perplexity mentions where 212 occurred—systematic undercounting at 97% accuracy gaps. The methodology is keyword-based rather than prompt-based, which misaligns with how users naturally query AI systems in full sentences and questions. And the minimum cost—EUR 773/mo when you add the all-indexes bundle (EUR 654/mo) to even the entry Ahrefs Lite plan (EUR 119/mo)—makes it the most expensive option in the AEO category by a wide margin.

This guide covers the 5 best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternatives for 2026, each with prompt-based tracking, sentiment analysis, or more accessible pricing.

What are the best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternatives?

The top 5 Ahrefs Brand Radar alternatives are Airefs, Profound, Peec AI, Otterly AI, and Superlines.

Airefs starts at $24/mo—97% less than Brand Radar’s EUR 773/mo minimum—with Reddit monitoring and a proactive opportunity discovery approach that Brand Radar’s backward-looking keyword methodology doesn’t offer. Profound at $99/mo is the G2 Winter 2026 Leader with 10+ platforms and prompt volume data that complements rather than replicates Brand Radar’s search-demand signal. Peec AI at $89/mo offers 115+ languages and UI-scraping accuracy that addresses Brand Radar’s documented undercounting issues. Otterly AI at $29/mo brings Gartner Cool Vendor 2025 credentials and sentiment analysis that Brand Radar lacks entirely. Superlines at EUR 89/mo covers 10+ platforms including DeepSeek, Mistral, and Grok using real UI scraping—methodologically more aligned with prompt-based AI queries than Brand Radar’s keyword approach.

Top Ahrefs Brand Radar alternatives — Comparison table

1. Airefs: Best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative for proactive AEO

Brand Radar is backward-looking by design—tracking what AI systems said about your brand across 253 million historical keywords. Airefs is forward-looking—tracking the Reddit threads and content gaps that will determine what AI says about your brand next.

At $24/mo, it costs 97% less than Brand Radar’s EUR 773/mo minimum while providing a more action-oriented workflow that keyword-based tracking can’t replicate.

The methodological difference matters beyond cost. Brand Radar uses keyword-based tracking—an adaptation of traditional SEO infrastructure that maps imperfectly to how users query AI with natural-language prompts and conversational follow-ups. Airefs uses prompt-based tracking that mirrors how users actually interact with AI systems. And the Reddit monitoring layer—surfacing conversations that will influence AI model preferences before they become established—provides intelligence that Brand Radar’s retrospective keyword methodology can’t capture at any price.

The Expert plan ($83/mo) adds unlimited domains, an AEO strategist, and 30 Reddit keywords—still less than 11% of Brand Radar’s minimum monthly cost.

Key features

• Prompt-based tracking: ChatGPT by default; other LLMs on request; daily refresh
• Reddit keyword monitoring: Track up to 30 keywords to surface future citation sources
• AI Search Analytics: Real AI-driven traffic and crawler monitoring on your site
• Competitor source analysis: Which sources your competitors are cited in
• Content opportunity identification: Specific pages and discussions AI models rely on in your market

Pricing

• Lite: $24/mo — 1 domain, 3 competitors, 25 prompts, 3 Reddit keywords
• Pro: $49/mo — 3 domains, 60 prompts, 10 Reddit keywords, 7-day free trial
• Expert: $83/mo — Unlimited domains, 150 prompts, 30 Reddit keywords, AEO strategist

Pros & cons

Pros:

• $24/mo vs EUR 773/mo minimum — 97% less expensive
• Prompt-based tracking aligns with how users naturally query AI — Brand Radar’s keyword approach doesn’t
• Reddit monitoring provides forward-looking intelligence that retrospective keyword data misses
• No accuracy issues — dedicated AEO tool without Brand Radar’s 97% undercounting in independent tests

Cons:

• No integration with SEO platform data — Brand Radar’s Ahrefs suite integration is a genuine strength
• No historical AI visibility data — Brand Radar’s historical dataset is unique
• No 253M+ prompt database — Brand Radar’s scale is unmatched
• Fewer platforms by default; requires opt-in for non-ChatGPT coverage

Customers

Airefs serves 100+ teams across startups, agencies, and B2B SaaS. 5.0/5 customer rating.

While every other AI search visibility tool showed me whether I was being cited, Airefs showed me all 571 URLs that were being cited.

— Lillian P, Fractional CMO

2. Profound: Best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative for enterprise teams

Brand Radar’s prompt database (253M+ monthly) is impressive but built on keyword-mapped queries—what Ahrefs knows about search demand, not what users actually ask AI. Profound’s G2 Winter 2026 Leader status covers 10+ AI platforms with prompt volume data showing actual AI search demand, ChatGPT Shopping tracking, and documented enterprise customers including TripAdvisor, HubSpot, McKinsey, and Ramp.

At $99/mo for the Starter and $399/mo for Growth, it’s between 4x and 8x cheaper than Brand Radar’s EUR 773/mo minimum.

Profound’s prompt volume data—actual query frequency for topics in your category across AI platforms—is the dedicated AEO alternative to Brand Radar’s search-demand signal. Where Brand Radar derives AI query volume from its existing keyword research infrastructure, Profound measures it directly from AI platforms. For enterprise teams that use Brand Radar partly for the strategic demand signal, Profound provides a more accurate AI-native equivalent at a fraction of the cost.

Key features

• 10+ AI platform tracking: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, AI Overviews, AI Mode, and more
• Prompt volume data: Actual AI search demand for topics in your category
• ChatGPT Shopping tracking: Visibility in AI-driven product recommendations
• Share of voice and citation analytics: Brand position across all tracked platforms
• Sentiment analysis: Quality and framing of brand references — absent from Brand Radar

Pricing

• Starter: $99/mo — ChatGPT only, 50 prompts
• Growth: $399/mo — 10+ platforms, unlimited prompts
• Enterprise: Custom

Pros & cons

Pros:

• G2 Winter 2026 Leader — stronger dedicated AEO category recognition than Brand Radar
• Sentiment analysis included — Brand Radar has no sentiment or quality scoring
• Prompt volume data shows actual AI search demand vs Brand Radar’s search-keyword extrapolation
• $99-$399/mo vs EUR 773/mo minimum — 2-8x cheaper
• TripAdvisor, HubSpot, McKinsey, Ramp — comparable enterprise track record

Cons:

• $99/mo Starter covers only ChatGPT — Brand Radar’s all-indexes bundle covers 6 platforms
• No integration with SEO platform data — Brand Radar’s Ahrefs suite connection is missing
• No historical AI visibility data — Brand Radar’s historical dataset has no equivalent
• No free trial — only a free AEO Report

Customers

Profound serves TripAdvisor, HubSpot, McKinsey, and Ramp, among others.

Profound has become an indispensable tool in our arsenal for AI search.

— Profound enterprise customer

3. Peec AI: Best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative for accuracy and global coverage

Brand Radar’s independent review found 97% undercounting in practice (3 reported mentions vs 123 actual on ChatGPT). Peec AI’s UI scraping methodology—actually interacting with AI interfaces as a real user would—captures the full response context without the systematic undercounting that keyword-mapped tracking produces.

At $89/mo with 115+ language support and a 14-day free trial, it addresses Brand Radar’s two most significant weaknesses: accuracy and international reach.

The accuracy gap matters for enterprise teams making strategic decisions on Brand Radar data. If the tool reports 3 mentions when 123 occurred, the share of voice calculations, the competitive benchmarking, and the visibility trend lines are all built on systematically incorrect inputs. Peec AI’s UI scraping approach addresses this at the methodology level rather than trying to calibrate around it. For brands that need AI visibility data they can trust for strategy—rather than directional signal—the accuracy difference between UI scraping and keyword mapping is a primary evaluation criterion.

Key features

• UI scraping accuracy: Real browser interactions for complete, accurate response capture
• 115+ language support: Monitor AI visibility across global markets
• Competitor citation analysis: Which sources competitors appear in that you don’t
• Campaign measurement: Before/after visibility measurement for content programs
• Sentiment analysis: Tone and framing of brand references across platforms

Pricing

• Starting: $89/mo — 14-day free trial
• Higher tiers: Custom pricing for enterprise volume

Pros & cons

Pros:

• UI scraping avoids Brand Radar’s documented 97% undercounting accuracy gap
• 115+ languages vs Brand Radar’s limited language documentation
• Sentiment analysis included — Brand Radar has no sentiment or quality scoring
• $89/mo vs EUR 773/mo minimum — 89% less expensive
• 14-day free trial; Brand Radar has no trial

Cons:

• No integration with SEO platform data — Brand Radar’s Ahrefs suite is a genuine strength
• No historical AI visibility data
• Fewer platforms at base (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews + add-ons) vs Brand Radar’s 6
• Less established prompt database scale than Brand Radar’s 253M+ monthly volume

Customers

Peec AI serves enterprise brands and agencies running multilingual AI visibility programs. 14-day free trial available.

Peec AI gave us the cross-language visibility data we needed to run a coordinated AEO program across six markets.

— Peec AI enterprise customer

4. Otterly AI: Best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative for validated mid-market teams

Brand Radar costs EUR 773/mo minimum and has no sentiment analysis. Otterly AI costs $29/mo, includes sentiment analysis, carries Gartner Cool Vendor 2025 recognition, and has a 4.9/5 rating across 250 verified G2 reviews.

For mid-market teams that need a credentialed, affordable alternative to Brand Radar’s prohibitive pricing, Otterly AI is the most validated option at this price point.

Otterly’s GEO Audit—25+ on-page factor analysis with prioritized optimization recommendations—is a capability Brand Radar doesn’t offer at any tier. While Brand Radar focuses on measuring AI visibility as a downstream output, Otterly’s GEO Audit identifies the on-page changes that will improve that visibility. For teams that want both measurement and actionable guidance, Otterly provides the optimization layer that Brand Radar, despite its scale, doesn’t include.

Key features

• 6-platform tracking: ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot
• Sentiment analysis: Tone and framing of brand references — absent from Brand Radar
• GEO Audit: 25+ on-page factors with optimization recommendations
• 40+ country support: Multi-language, multi-region monitoring
• Automated weekly reports: Regular summaries for team and stakeholder updates

Pricing

• Starter: $29/mo — 14-day free trial, no credit card
• Growth: $189/mo
• Business: $489/mo
• Enterprise: Custom

Pros & cons

Pros:

• $29/mo vs EUR 773/mo — 96% less expensive with no per-platform add-on fees
• Sentiment analysis included — Brand Radar has no equivalent
• GEO Audit provides optimization guidance Brand Radar doesn’t offer
• Gartner Cool Vendor 2025 and G2 High Performer — comparable enterprise validation
• 14-day free trial; Brand Radar has no trial

Cons:

• 6 platforms vs Brand Radar’s 6 — similar coverage at very different prices, but missing Claude and Grok
• No integration with SEO platform data
• No 253M+ historical prompt database
• Small team (2-10 employees); Ahrefs has 300+ employees

Customers

Otterly AI serves Opera, Bacula Systems, XXXLutz, Avis Budget Group, Auto1, Storyblocks, and Campaign Monitor.

2x increase in both our visibility in AI search engines and incoming traffic.

— Rebecca Anderson, Instant Commerce

5. Superlines: Best Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative for broadest prompt-based coverage

Brand Radar covers 6 AI platforms using keyword-based tracking. Superlines covers 10+ platforms—adding DeepSeek, Mistral, Grok, and others—using real UI interface data that captures how users actually interact with AI systems.

At EUR 89/mo, it costs less than 12% of Brand Radar’s EUR 773/mo minimum and avoids the keyword-to-prompt translation gap that underlies Brand Radar’s documented accuracy issues.

The MCP (Model Context Protocol) server support is a forward-looking differentiator: it integrates Superlines’ AI visibility data directly into agentic workflows, allowing teams to build automated monitoring and response systems on top of real-time brand visibility data. Brand Radar has no agentic integration layer. For teams building AI-native marketing operations rather than just monitoring dashboards, Superlines’ MCP support represents a different category of capability.

Key features

• 10+ platform coverage: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, DeepSeek, Mistral, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, and more
• Real UI scraping: Interface-level data capture for accuracy Brand Radar’s keyword mapping can’t match
• MCP server support: Direct integration into agentic workflows
• Sentiment analysis: Tone and framing of brand references
• Competitor benchmarking: Share of voice across all 10+ platforms

Pricing

• Starter: EUR 89/mo (monthly), EUR 74/mo (annual)
• Higher tiers: Custom pricing for enterprise volume
• 7-day free trial

Pros & cons

Pros:

• 10+ platforms vs Brand Radar’s 6 — broader coverage including DeepSeek, Mistral, Grok
• Real UI scraping avoids keyword-based accuracy issues
• MCP server enables agentic workflow integration — Brand Radar has no equivalent
• EUR 89/mo vs EUR 773/mo minimum — 88% less expensive
• 7-day free trial; Brand Radar has no trial

Cons:

• No integration with SEO platform data — Brand Radar’s Ahrefs suite connection is absent
• No 253M+ historical prompt database
• Smaller user base and validation profile than Brand Radar or Profound
• EUR-based pricing creates currency uncertainty for US teams

Customers

Superlines serves agencies, SaaS teams, and enterprise brands running cross-platform AEO programs. 7-day free trial available.

Superlines gives us real-time visibility across platforms that keyword-based tools simply can’t track accurately.

— Superlines customer

Frequently asked questions

Why look for Ahrefs Brand Radar alternatives?

Three reasons: cost, methodology, and accuracy. Cost: EUR 773/mo minimum makes Brand Radar the most expensive AEO option by a wide margin—all five alternatives in this guide cost between 88% and 97% less. Methodology: keyword-based tracking is misaligned with natural-language AI queries. Accuracy: independent testing found Brand Radar undercounting ChatGPT mentions by 97% and Perplexity mentions by 97%. For teams that need accurate, affordable, prompt-based AI visibility tracking, dedicated AEO tools perform better.

Does any alternative have Brand Radar’s 253M+ prompt database?

No. Brand Radar’s search-backed prompt database—built on Ahrefs’ existing keyword infrastructure—is unmatched in scale. The database is also the source of the keyword-to-prompt translation problem: it’s large, but it’s built on search queries mapped to AI contexts rather than actual AI queries. Profound’s prompt volume data is closer in spirit (measuring actual AI search demand) but at significantly smaller scale. For research-level prompt volume analysis, Brand Radar’s database remains unique.

Which alternative has the best accuracy?

Peec AI and Superlines use UI scraping—actually interacting with AI interfaces as a real user would—which captures complete response contexts without the systematic undercounting that keyword-mapped tracking produces. This methodology is more aligned with how AI platforms actually work and avoids the accuracy gap that independent testing identified in Brand Radar’s keyword approach.

How many AI platforms do these alternatives cover?

Profound: 10+ platforms. Superlines: 10+ platforms including DeepSeek, Mistral, Grok. Brand Radar: 6 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, AI Overviews, AI Mode). Otterly AI: 6. Peec AI: ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews + add-ons. Airefs: ChatGPT by default with other LLMs on request.

Is there a free trial for these alternatives?

Airefs: 7-day trial on Pro. Otterly AI: 14-day trial, no credit card. Peec AI: 14-day trial, no credit card. Superlines: 7-day trial. Profound: free AEO Report. Brand Radar: no free trial. Otterly AI and Peec AI offer the most generous no-credit-card trials.

Do any alternatives integrate with the Ahrefs SEO platform?

No. Brand Radar’s integration with Site Explorer, Keywords Explorer, Rank Tracker, and Site Audit is unique to the Ahrefs ecosystem. For teams that use Ahrefs and need that integration specifically, there is no equivalent. The decision is whether the integration value justifies EUR 773/mo vs using a dedicated AEO tool alongside your existing Ahrefs subscription.

What’s the most important thing Brand Radar offers that alternatives don’t?

Two things: the Ahrefs SEO platform integration and historical AI visibility data. The integration lets teams correlate AI visibility with traditional SEO metrics in a single platform. The historical data provides context about AI visibility trends before most dedicated AEO tools existed. Both are genuine differentiators—neither is replicated by any alternative at any price point.

Conclusion: Choosing your Ahrefs Brand Radar alternative

For teams that want proactive AEO at the lowest cost, Airefs at $24/mo provides Reddit monitoring and prompt-based tracking for 97% less than Brand Radar’s minimum cost—identifying future citation opportunities that retrospective keyword data misses.

For enterprise teams that need a direct Brand Radar replacement with better accuracy, Profound at $99-$399/mo delivers G2 Winter 2026 Leader status, 10+ platforms, prompt volume data, and sentiment analysis—capabilities Brand Radar, despite its scale, doesn’t offer.

For teams where accuracy is the primary concern, Peec AI at $89/mo with UI scraping methodology directly addresses the documented 97% undercounting gap that independent testing found in Brand Radar’s keyword-based tracking.

For mid-market teams that need validated credentials at affordable pricing, Otterly AI at $29/mo provides Gartner Cool Vendor 2025 recognition, sentiment analysis, and a GEO Audit for 96% less than Brand Radar’s monthly minimum.

For teams that need the broadest prompt-based platform coverage, Superlines at EUR 89/mo covers 10+ platforms with real UI scraping and MCP server support for agentic workflows—88% cheaper than Brand Radar with better methodology alignment.

Want to start tracking AI visibility for less than 4% of Ahrefs Brand Radar’s cost? Try Airefs free for 7 days — $24/mo with Reddit monitoring and prompt-based tracking.