How to maximise your visibility inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & AIO.
Published
Jul 11, 2025
Author
Paul
Why AI Search Optimization matters
The answer box is the new front page
In 2025 an estimated 37 % of product‑research queries now start with a chat‑style assistant, not a classic SERP.
Whenever the assistant writes a complete answer, the ten blue links become a footnote.
If your brand sits inside that narrative, you control the story. If not, someone else does.
Traffic is leaking in plain sight
Server logs from 11 large publishers show that AI‑specific crawlers (GPTBot, PerplexityBot, CCBot, Bingbot‑Discover) multiplied twenty‑three‑fold between January 2024 and April 2025.
During the same window Google organic clicks shrank by 7 % year on year.
The curve is steep and shows no sign of flattening.
Citation ≠ ranking
A ten‑million‑query audit found that only 12 % of pages cited by ChatGPT overlapped with Google’s first page.
In a second test 48 hours after publication, a new page earned a Perplexity citation while still languishing beyond page 50 on Google.
Ranking and retrieval are now different games.
Format bias picks winners
When researchers categorised one million citations, comparative listicles generated 32.5 % of all links, far out‑performing how‑tos, thought‑leadership essays and news articles.
Short, structured content is easier to quote.
The cost of invisibility
When an assistant features a competitor’s quote, your click‑through opportunity vanishes.
In B2B SaaS tests, a single lost citation on a high‑volume question translated to 1 200 fewer demo sign‑ups per quarter.
Momentum keeps accelerating
Independent forecasts agree the adoption curve is nowhere near its ceiling:
Search share projections: Two separate analyst houses predict conversational assistants will account for 50 % of all informational queries by 2027, doubling today’s share.
Hardware integration: Microsoft has bundled Copilot into Windows 11; Apple is tipped to ship a system‑level assistant in iOS 19, pushing AI answers to a billion extra screens overnight.
Publisher data: Across 110 newsrooms, AI crawler traffic continues to rise ~4 % month on month, a compound rate that would triple total volume within two years.
The underlying trend is self‑reinforcing: Faster answers drive more usage; more usage fuels crawler demand; richer indexes make the answers better—pulling yet more queries into the chat box.
💡 Take‑away: Buyers will skip traditional search engines and trust the first answer they read. If that answer doesn’t quote you, your brand stays outside the decision loop.
Why it’s not just SEO work
Search‑engine optimisation was built for keywords, blue links and click‑through rates.
AI answers change all three fundamentals before the ranking algorithm even starts:
Prompts ≠ keywords – People talk to ChatGPT the way they would brief a colleague. Queries become full sentences or multi‑part instructions (“Plan a five‑day vegan menu under €50”). Traditional keyword research tools rarely surface these phrasings, so classic SEO coverage maps leave gaps.
Top‑10 on Google ≠ Top‑slot in an answer – A page can rank #3 for “best project‑management tools” and still sit behind three different sources in a ChatGPT reply to “Which PM tool is cheapest for startups?” Passage authority, freshness, and structure matter more than positional rank.
Classic SEO still counts—speed, mobile UX, canonical tags—but now shares the stage with entity clarity, chunk design and community footprint.
That adds three new lanes of work:
Lane | What changes | Why it matters |
---|---|---|
Chunk design | Pages become source blocks (≈ 100–400 tokens). | Models copy passages verbatim. Clean, short chunks win. |
Crawler access | New user‑agents demand fast, simple HTML and priority feeds. | If the bot can’t fetch a passage it never enters the index. |
Reputation seeding | Forums, news sites, YouTube transcripts, and Wikidata train the next model snapshot. | Mentions in third‑party data sets raise trust and recall. |
Here are 5 tactics that boost AI visibility without touching keywords, backlinks, or code.
Workstream | What to do this week | Why it helps AI quote you |
---|---|---|
Publish a one‑page stat sheet | Turn last quarter’s survey or usage data into a one‑page PDF titled “5 Key Stats About X in 2025,” then host it on your site. | Assistants love fresh numbers. A clean PDF with clear headings is easy to parse and cite. |
Answer one Quora or Reddit question | Spend 15 minutes posting a helpful, non‑promotional reply in a thread your buyers read. | Reddit and Quora content is licensed by most LLM makers; up‑voted answers surface in AI responses. |
Add captions to every new video | Use YouTube’s auto‑caption, then edit for accuracy before publishing. | Captions supply plain text that models ingest, making your video a quotable source. |
Reply to customer reviews in detail | Respond with two sentences that repeat the product name and one specific benefit. | Detailed language inside trusted review platforms sends product signals to Gemini and Bing Chat. |
Update your Wikidata fact sheet | Add founding year, HQ city, and website URL—takes under ten minutes. | Clear entity data reduces brand mix‑ups and helps assistants map mentions to you, not a namesake. |
💡 Take‑away: SEO foundations still matter—speed, canonical tags, indexing, content, backlinks—but it now shares the stage with entity clarity, snippet packaging and community footprint.
How different LLM engines pick different winners
Profound’s 41‑million‑result benchmark shows that ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview each lean on a different mix of data and ranking heuristics.
Tailoring content to those biases fast‑tracks citations.
Engine | Core retrieval stack | Slide‑verified top domains | What the bias means | High‑leverage moves |
---|---|---|---|---|
ChatGPT (Browse on) | GPT‑4o snapshot plus the Bing index for live look‑ups |
| Loves evergreen authority + marketplace reviews; Bing on‑page SEO still nudges Browse. | Strengthen or build a Wikipedia page; capture G2/Amazon listings; get in Bing index and keep Bing‑friendly title tags; cite government or academic data to earn authority bonus. |
Perplexity | Proprietary crawler feeding a semantic vector search layer; real‑time Reddit & Hacker News licence |
| Heavy recency & UGC tilt; up‑votes boost passage score; concise chunks dominate. | Publish fresh listicles; answer trending subreddit questions; upload short YouTube explainers with bullet captions; keep FAQ sections 100–200 words for tight embeddings. |
Google AI Overview | Google index + Knowledge Graph + E‑E‑A‑T re‑rank |
| Domain‑agnostic but schema‑sensitive; reviews and entity consistency push pages upward. | Pair schema‑rich product pages (> 50 reviews) with explainer videos; maintain consistent entity data in Wikidata; engage on Quora for topical depth. |
💡 Takeaway: It’s not one strategy for all LLMs —match your strategy to the engine that matters most to your buyers.
How LLMs 'like' content
1. Write long and easy-to-read pages
A study of 7 000+ citations shows that the pages most often quoted by ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews are 4 000-10 000 words, 1 000+ sentences, and sit in a Flesch Reading-Ease band of 50-65. Word count, sentence count and Flesch score beat backlinks or traffic as drivers of citations.

The Flesch score measures how simple your text is. Scores run from 0 to 100; 60-70 = “plain English”, understood by 13- to 15-year-olds, while anything below 30 reads like a legal contract.
2. Be a brand people already look for
Chatbots talk about brands that people search for a lot. In the data, higher branded-search volume was the strongest single predictor of brand mentions (ρ≈0.33 overall; 0.54 inside ChatGPT).
3. Use the words users put in their prompts
Titles or headers that contain trigger terms—“best”, “trusted”, “recommend”, “reliable”—make chatbots far more likely to serve a ranked list and include well-known brands. “Best” alone appeared in 70 % of prompt samples that produced brand lists.
4. Keep the bots’ path clear
Sites vanished from Copilot and others because key pages weren’t indexed in Bing or because robots.txt / CDN rules blocked GPTBot, CCBot, PerplexityBot, ClaudeBot or Google-Extended. If the crawlers can’t reach you, nothing else matters. growth-memo.com
💡 Takeaway: Chatbots surface long, plain-English pages from popular brands—especially when your headline echoes “best/trusted” and their crawlers aren’t shut out.
The Playbook: 40 plays for growing your AI presence
Below you’ll find forty practical plays sorted into four workstreams so you can slice the roadmap to fit your team:
Technical Foundations (Plays 1–10) – Everything that opens the crawl gates, cleans the code, and signals your preferred pages to bots.
On‑Site Content (Plays 11–20) – How to package words, lists, tables and media so assistants can lift them verbatim.
Off‑Site & Reputation (Plays 21–30) – External signals—press, community, reviews—that push your passages up the re‑rank stack.
Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement (Plays 31–40) – The dashboards and feedback loops that keep wins compounding.
Technical foundations
Allow GPTBot, Bingbot & friends — If the bot can’t see you, nothing else in this guide matters. Make sure your
robots.txt
doesn’t block them.Index content ASAP — LLM answer engines reward freshness. Use IndexNow, Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools for new/update web pages.
Use clean URL path — ****Keep them clean and readable, never more than three levels deep. Use hyphens not underscores. Example: /blog/ai-search/technical-setup.
Serve server‑side rendered or static HTML — JavaScript‑heavy pages waste tokens or never render for some AI crawlers.
Serve content fast – Target <1 s Time‑to‑First‑Byte and <2 s Largest Contentful Paint. Defer non‑critical JS and use lazy‑loading.
Add structured data — Schema makes your intent machine‑readable e.g.
Article
for blog posts,FAQPage
/Question
/Answer
for Q&A blocks, etc.Implement
hreflang
and regional tags — Gemini and Bing swap in the best locale version when you label it clearly.Keep an updated
sitemap.xml
andllms.txt
files at the root — Think of llms.txt as an AI‑era XML sitemap. Generate one here.Implement crawl budget controls – Prioritize high‑value pages with
<priority>
in sitemaps and strategicnoindex
/nofollow
on low‑impact URLs.Secure everything (HTTPS, HSTS) – Security is a quality signal. Enforce HTTPS and HSTS site‑wide and audit for mixed‑content leaks.
On‑Site content
Craft unique meta titles and descriptions – Clear titles and persuasive summaries still influence click‑through, which in turn informs engagement metrics.
Reinforce entity–task associations – Repeat patterns e.g. “ENP is the tool for invoicing” so questions like “What is a great tool for invoicing?” match your content.
Favour tl;dr and short answers — LLMs love bite‑sized chunks. Place a punchy summary after each H2/H3/H4/H5 so any retriever can quote you verbatim.
Create comparative listicles — The Profound study shows 32.5 % of citations come from side‑by‑side comparisons. Short verdicts and orderly bulleting win inclusion.
Add structured FAQ blocks — Marked‑up FAQs often appear under “People Also Ask” and feed Perplexity’s related‑question carousel.
Embed factual tables & key‑value lists – LLMs love structured nuggets. Provide specs, comparisons, timelines, and glossaries as native HTML tables or definition lists.
Provide authoritative citations – Pull‑quotes, fresh statistics, and inline citations with links to sources to raise factual confidence and give models quotable nuggets.
Transcribe videos and podcasts — YouTube, Apple Podcasts and Spotify transcripts all end up in training data. Hosting them yourself doubles the chance of citation.
Add multilingual mirrored answers — Non‑English SGE results have huge gaps. Human‑translated copies can make you the only viable source.
Create author quality signals — Bios, credentials and LinkedIn links help quality re‑rankers decide whom to trust.
Refresh evergreen content quarterly – Add the latest stats, remove dated references, and update examples; then reping indexing APIs.
Track converting user prompts - Ask AI search referrals at signup what prompt made them discover your business.
Off‑Site & reputation
Cultivate high‑quality backlinks – Earn citations from .edu, .gov, and niche authorities through guest posts, data studies, and partnerships.
Amplify on social‑media clusters – Share distilled answer cards on LinkedIn, X, and niche forums; LLMs crawl social embeds for freshness signals.
Offer expert contributions — Offer a proprietary stat and 100‑word insight; most hosts will link the source.
Add to Reddit threads & Quora answers — Well‑upvoted posts show up in answers within days. Create your own thread as needed.
Make YouTube videos — Publish SRT captions and chapter markers so multi‑modal models can quote you time‑stamped.
Be a podcast guest — LLMs ingest the transcript and often quote it over the audio itself.
Get rich customer reviews — Long‑form, photo‑rich reviews trigger Google’s product schema and feed trust signals for Gemini.
Have a company entity on Crunchbase, LinkedIn, Wikipedia, Substack, etc. — Consistent entity properties help ChatGPT recognize your brand.
Integrate with popular tools — A Zapier or Figma plug‑in inserts your brand into user workflows and their documentation, creating mention loops.
Monitor sentiment & respond quickly – Address misinformation or negative reviews within 24 h; sentiment is a subtle ranking signal.
Continuous monitoring & reinforcement
Track crawl stats & errors – Review log files and GSC/Bing reports weekly; fix spikes in 404s, 500s, render failures.
Automate link health checks – Scan for broken external/internal links monthly and patch or replace promptly.
Monitor high-intent user prompts - Test the same 10 to 20 high-intent prompts each month on ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AIO.
Update your content strategy based on data — Adapt your content based on AI search impression, click and signup data.
A/B test snippet structures – Experiment with list vs. paragraph vs. table answers; keep the variation that ranks or converts best.
Schedule quarterly content audits – Prune or merge cannibalizing articles; redirect low‑performers to fresher, richer pieces.
Leverage feedback loops from user queries – Mine on‑site search and chat logs for unanswered questions; convert them into helpful content.
Annual schema refresh — Schema.org evolves; stay current so parsers don’t ignore new properties.
Low | Medium | High | |
---|---|---|---|
Effort | 🟢 | 🟡 | 🔴 |
Impact | 🔴 | 🟡 | 🟢 |
# | Category | Play | Effort | Impact |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Technical Foundations | Allow GPTBot & friends | 🟢 | 🟢 |
2 | Technical Foundations | Index content ASAP | 🟢 | 🟢 |
3 | Technical Foundations | Use clean URL path | 🟡 | 🟢 |
4 | Technical Foundations | Serve SSR/static HTML | 🔴 | 🟢 |
5 | Technical Foundations | Serve content fast | 🟡 | 🟢 |
6 | Technical Foundations | Add structured data | 🟡 | 🟢 |
7 | Technical Foundations | Implement hreflang & regional tags | 🟡 | 🟡 |
8 | Technical Foundations | Updated sitemap & llms.txt | 🟢 | 🟡 |
9 | Technical Foundations | Crawl budget controls | 🟡 | 🟡 |
10 | Technical Foundations | Secure HTTPS | 🟢 | 🟡 |
11 | On‑Site Content | Craft unique meta titles & descriptions | 🟢 | 🟡 |
12 | On‑Site Content | Reinforce entity–task associations | 🟢 | 🟡 |
13 | On‑Site Content | Favour TL;DR and short answers | 🟢 | 🟢 |
14 | On‑Site Content | Create comparative listicles | 🟡 | 🟢 |
15 | On‑Site Content | Add structured FAQ blocks | 🟡 | 🟢 |
16 | On‑Site Content | Embed factual tables & key‑value lists | 🟡 | 🟢 |
17 | On‑Site Content | Provide authoritative citations | 🟡 | 🟢 |
18 | On‑Site Content | Transcribe videos and podcasts | 🟡 | 🟡 |
19 | On‑Site Content | Add multilingual mirrored answers | 🔴 | 🟡 |
20 | On‑Site Content | Create author quality signals | 🟢 | 🟡 |
21 | On‑Site Content | Refresh evergreen content quarterly | 🟡 | 🟢 |
22 | On‑Site Content | Track converting user prompts | 🟢 | 🟡 |
23 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Cultivate high‑quality backlinks | 🔴 | 🟢 |
24 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Amplify on social‑media clusters | 🟡 | 🟡 |
25 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Offer expert contributions | 🟡 | 🟡 |
26 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Reddit threads & Quora answers | 🟡 | 🟡 |
27 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Make YouTube videos | 🔴 | 🟡 |
28 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Be a podcast guest | 🟡 | 🟡 |
29 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Get rich customer reviews | 🟡 | 🟢 |
30 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Company entity on KGs & profiles | 🟢 | 🟡 |
31 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Integrate with popular tools | 🔴 | 🟢 |
32 | Off‑Site & Reputation | Monitor sentiment & respond quickly | 🟡 | 🟡 |
33 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Track crawl stats & errors | 🟡 | 🟢 |
34 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Automate link health checks | 🟢 | 🟡 |
35 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Monitor high‑intent user prompts | 🟡 | 🟡 |
36 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Update content strategy based on data | 🟡 | 🟢 |
37 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | A/B test snippet structures | 🟡 | 🟢 |
38 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Schedule quarterly content audits | 🟡 | 🟡 |
39 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Feedback loops from user queries | 🟡 | 🟢 |
40 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Annual schema refresh | 🟢 | 🟡 |
41 | Continuous Monitoring & Reinforcement | Iterate with LLM‑powered content agents | 🔴 | 🟢 |
AI search metrics and how to measure them
When an AI assistant surfaces an answer, your brand can appear in multiple formats.
Understanding the nuances (and how each one funnels users toward your site) lets you focus optimisation effort where it turns into revenue.
Visibility signals
Signal | What the user is able to see | Traffic potential | Typical journey |
---|---|---|---|
Impression | Your brand or URL is included in the assistant’s answer—either as plain text or a footnote. | Low | Someone searched for something related to your content. |
Plain mention | Brand is named in the visible text, no link. | Medium | Builds credibility much like a press quote but delivers zero direct visits. |
Linked mention | Brand name is visible clickable (either the full domain URL or the brand name) | High | Perplexity often uses this style; sparks curiosity clicks. |
Citation | Full URL shown in footnote, side bar or source list. | Low | Clear authority signal; easiest to attribute in analytics. |
Multi‑citation cluster | Two or more of your URLs cited together. | Medium | Dominates the answer and squeezes out competitors. |
Mention vs Citation
Aspect | Mention | Citation |
---|---|---|
In the LLM answer | Yes | Not always - can be part of the sources (separate panel) |
Link present? | Sometimes yes, sometimes no. | Always contains a visible, direct URL |
Tracking difficulty | Hard (requires brand‑mention monitoring) if it’s not a link. | |
Moderate if it’s a link (user may or may not click on it) | Moderate (standard referrer + UTM) |
Funnel metrics
Metric | What it measures | Tools to track | Why it matters |
---|---|---|---|
Impressions | Count of times your brand/URL appeared in an AI answer. | Top‑of‑funnel visibility indicator | |
Clicks | Users who clicked through from an AI answer to your site. | https://getairefs.com, Google Analytics | Shows how compelling your snippet/link is |
Signups | Users who completed account creation or lead form after arriving from an AI answer. | Analytics goals, CRM attribution models, self-serve attribution | Ultimate conversion—ties AI visibility to revenue |
💡 Takeaway: Seeing your name is step one; earning the visit is step two but converting that visit into a customer is the ultimate goal.
AI Search Case Studies
Brand | Tactic Deployed | Result Reported | Link |
---|---|---|---|
Profound 10 M Prompt Study | Bench‑marked 10 M AI search prompts to identify content‑format bias | Listicles accounted for 32.5 % of all citations across engines | |
AutoRFP.ai | Implemented AI search optimisations and refreshed key pages | 10× increase in ChatGPT‑referred traffic; 33 % of demos now sourced from GenAI search | https://athenahq.ai/case-studies/10x-chatgpt-traffic-autorfp-success-story |
Verito | Optimised content around high‑value prompts | Reached 36 % Share of Voice on ChatGPT within 6‑8 weeks, beating rivals 25× larger | https://athenahq.ai/case-studies/36-sov-verito-success-story |
Ramp | Used AI search data insights to publish citation‑driven pages | AI visibility grew 7× (3.2 → 22.2 %) in 1 month; jumped from 19th to 8th in sector | |
1840 & Co | Produced AI‑friendly comparison content | From 0 % to 11 % AI visibility in 1 month; rose to top‑5 remote‑staffing brand | https://www.tryprofound.com/customers/1840-co-answer-engine-optimization-case-study |
Tally | Doubled down on community‑driven content | 25 % of new sign‑ups attributed directly to ChatGPT referrals | |
Interact | Be the most mentioned brand in our category | Grew ARR by $192,000 in Q2. |
Sources
https://www.tryprofound.com/guides/what-is-llms-txt-guide
https://graphite.io/five-percent/aeo-is-the-new-seo
https://mmc.vc/research/ai-discoverability-how-can-i-get-chatgpt-to-recommend-my-brand/
https://vercel.com/blog/the-rise-of-the-ai-crawler
https://www.samhogan.sh/blog/profound-10m-search-study
https://www.iloveseo.net/a-guide-to-semantics-or-how-to-be-visible-both-in-search-and-llms/
https://www.iloveseo.net/the-role-of-seo-in-making-branding-understood-by-search-engines-and-ai/
https://www.iloveseo.net/why-ai-mode-will-replace-traditional-search-as-googles-default-interface/
https://www.seerinteractive.com/insights/what-drives-brand-mentions-in-ai-answers
https://www.growth-memo.com/p/what-content-works-well-in-llms
https://www.tryprofound.com/guides/the-surprising-gap-between-chatgpt-and-google
https://www.tryprofound.com/guides/answer-engine-optimization-aeo-guide-for-marketers-2025
https://www.tryprofound.com/guides/what-is-answer-engine-optimization
https://www.athenahq.ai/blog/generative-engine-optimization-the-future-of-search-success
https://www.athenahq.ai/blog/crack-the-code-how-to-increase-mentions-in-chatgpt-for-more-traffic